LiveInternet service administration was concerned that an unknown attacker copies the contents of the diaries in bloghosting LiveJournal without any references to the source.
It may indeed is a specially designed script for commercial purposes, as ' clones ' LiveInternet- ekauntov Learn not the usual RSS-translation (this option to export records maintained as a Livejournal, and on LiveInternet). The titles of journals, copies are messy set of letters and related cross-references to each other ( if the original post, the author refers to another user LiveInternet). It is noteworthy that all the ' clones ', which cites the principal developer of LiveInternet Valentint Lyubimov, were created simultaneously - September 9.
Lyubimov himself believes that the cloning of the diaries is ' for the sake of cheating the number of entries in the blog. Yandex (service blogs. yandex. ru - Ed. ), Which certainly exists, or for the effect on the credibility of the ratings in the same blog. Yandex '. He had already sent a complaint to the technical support LiveJournal. com and ' Yandex ', and in ' Yandex ' he assured that ... Support service Livejournal so far they have not responded to a request Lyubimov.
' Sure, Conflict complaints commission checks - this will be done tonight - told ' Vebplaneta ' Polina Pashkevich, marketing director of SUP ( the owner of the service Livejournal and the American company of the same name ), and added that the possible delay in the work related to Abuse Team .
It is worth noting that the problem of the working mechanisms of protection of intellectual property in RuNet is becoming increasingly important, and applies not only to questions of authorship on user-generated content, but also automated services, parasitic on the commercial content. Thus, the chief editor of Pravda. py ' is going to sue news aggregators Newsland. ru, who makes his living by reprinting material from other publications from the microscopic reference ' Original Article ' in a separate block.
The situation around the copy number of different diaries. According to the regulations on limitation of liability in the ' User agreement ' ( PS), the administration of LiveJournal is not responsible for the content of journals. However, while the situation has not reached the court, winning only one who draws from her profit.
As of SUP do not agree with the assumptions that produce magazines, violating copyrights, it is advantageous. ... Creating bots, stealing someone else's content, it is absolutely not profitable and even more dangerous because it threatens the very existence of life, and at similar risk, we will never go '.
No comments:
Post a Comment